According to the BC Prosecution Provider (BCPS), the reduction of a significant witness and modifications in testimony brought about the Crown’s situation from construction large Kiewit for the loss of life of a employee to collapse.

On Aug. 31 the BCPS declared that a stay of proceedings experienced been entered in the case in opposition to Peter Kiewit Sons ULC (Kiewit), Timothy Rule and Gerald Karjala.

The get-togethers were billed with felony negligence resulting in death just after Samuel Fitzpatrick was struck and killed by a boulder in 2009.

In accordance to documents from the provider, the heart of their circumstance for the death of 24-year-old Fitzpatrick stemmed from a blasting and slope stabilization expert that was retained by the RCMP during its investigation. The skilled considered Kiewit and its managers ended up negligent and that bad interaction and bad web site co-ordination were critical aspects in Fitzpatrick’s death by a slipping rock at a hydroelectric job site.

When expenses have been 1st submitted, the Crown’s idea was that an excavator operator moved his equipment to a situation above the drill and blast crew disturbing the loose material that had been piled formerly near the treeline. The rock afterwards moved from that loose substance and killed Fitzpatrick.

The Crown prepared to argue that Kiewit and its professionals violated policies about not possessing crews do the job above every single other.

“The accessible proof indicated that the most most likely lead to of the unstable rock currently being dislodged was a combination of rain, gravity, thawing, and the vibrations from the excavator and the drilling,” explained the Crown in a statement, incorporating the skilled stated the site’s professionals ought to have been informed of the risks and resolved them.

But matters changed in April when the pro died and a new expert took their spot.

The new expert thought it was achievable internet site action contributed to the rock slipping, but felt proof was lacking and it was most probable because of to natural freeze-thaw cycles loosening substance. The professional also noted its achievable the rock arrived from a substantially more spot wherever internet site activity would not have been a issue.

The specialist did not give an viewpoint on Kiewit’s function strategy for the site which ended up not accessible for evaluate. However pretrial interviews unveiled these paperwork existed but ended up not obtained throughout the investigation and the Crown did not have them.

The professional also was not self-assured that the excavator’s position constituted technically being earlier mentioned the other crew or that the two supervisors who ended up billed have been responsible.

Pretrial interviews in July also threw a wrench into the prosecution’s scenario.

Witnesses experienced trouble remembering specifics of the 2009 incident or added considerable variations to their testimony. This incorporated the spot of the excavator, the degree of interaction from professionals or in which the rock arrived from.

“The memories of witness have degraded noticeably,” said the Crown. “There was a delay of virtually six many years in initiating an RCMP investigation (February 2009 to December 2014) and a different two-and-a-half-many years until the Crown experienced all the content it desired from law enforcement.”

The Crown also noted that several witnesses were still Kiewit staff or consultants and their recollections ended up “limited or self-serving.”

The absence of regularity in witness accounts proved to be a main barrier, Crown officials mentioned, which manufactured it so they could not exclude the likelihood that the rockfall was a random celebration originating exterior of the work zone.

“The evidence available now is not able of proving essential factors of the offences charged against every single of the accused,” mentioned Crown officers. “In building this assessment Crown Counsel have not only deemed their primary principle but also all achievable alternate theories and procedures of evidence.”


Follow the writer on Twitter @RussellReports.